I found on the Internet reviews of SMP — www.smpdebate.com. What is your take on all these sites that offer SMP?
They claim they are “the worlds only unbiased source of guidance and information on the fastest growing hair loss solution in recent history, a solution known as scalp micropigmentation.“
Well, the “unbiased” SMPdebate.com has a Facebook page that is run by a man that just happens to have a video on YouTube where he says he’s employed by one of the clinics listed on that site. Doesn’t seem so unbiased now, does it? That site seems just to be a clever advertisement, since I don’t see how you could be unbiased when you’re employed by one of clinics being reviewed.
Hair Transplant Network is supposed to be an unbiased review of doctors, but the doctors on the site all pay a monthly fee (over a thousand dollars) to be on the site. Yelp is supposed to be an unbiased review of most places, but even they have come into scrutiny when they favor (with positive reviews) those who pay them a monthly service fee.
I think that unless there are hundreds or thousands of independent reviews, a few polarized reviewers are always going to seem suspect. We maintain that you should visit us, as we hold free monthly open house events that provide access to our clients/patients so you can see the quality of what we do for yourself. Seeing is believing!
from Hair Loss Information http://ift.tt/PUhVHs